![]() I'm aware of the downscaling and degradation of the footage. ![]() I then unchecked the two settings above, and exported in PR and ME using identical settings. Both of the exports, with identical settings, yeilded results identical to the "BAD" images that I provided above. I made a new sequence and export with the matching framerate of 29.97. Unfortunately I cannot go above 1080p 3 Mbps because of Instagram's upload restrictions. Doing so solved the blurriness issue in a PR export, but not in a ME export, as I stated in the original post. I initially checked the "Use Maximum Render Quality" because I know that it can help sharpen motion graphics (like the after effects composition that I am using for the lower thirds asset). Thanks for any help, and please let me know if I need to elaborate anything! Is there a solution here that I am not seeing? Or am I forced to use one of the solutions above? I love using ME for all my projects, large or small, and I hate to mistrust it. Now I realize that the obvious solution would be to use a 1080p sequence, or just export in PR and not ME, however I don't prefer to use a 1080p sequence to preserve the quality for a possible later export (future proofing), and I don't like to export in PR because I'm typically doing 6 exports at the same time, and ME is a HUGE time saver since I can queue all of them. This leads me to believe that the issue is a scaling issue that is present in ME, but no PR. To be completely thurough, I did the project again in a 1080p sequence, and the issue dissapeared entirely. The projects are so minimal and my computer is powerful enough that rendering before exporting is not neccessary for playback and is a waste of time for me. I even did a sanity check, and made SURE that the MRQ box was still selected after being placed in ME.įor further exploration, I tried rendering the footage before exporting it, which made no difference. When I later checked the MRQ box, a PR export will look like the "good" example above, but a ME export will still look like the "bad" example. When I first exported, I didn't check the "Use Maximum Render Quality" (MRQ) box, and the output looked like the "bad" example above whether or not I used PR or ME. (I'm a little bit of a noob at AE, but am currently learning it). The lower thirds was made by me in After Effects at 4k, 60fps and then exported into the "Essential Graphics" panel for use in Premiere Pro. ![]() Here's an example of the quality difference in the video that is being exported, specifically the low quality of the lower thirds. (the low bitrate is due to instagram's regulations) ![]() Project Audio Format: 48000 Hz - 32 bit floating point - Stereo Source Audio Format: 48000 Hz - 16-bit - Stereo Samsung 970 EVO 500GB (contains the operating system, all adobe programs, and all current files I'm using for the project)įootage: (shot on a relatively new Sony DSLR, not sure about the model number, I don't shoot the footage) I typically do them all at once for the week, and export them all at once with Adobe Media Encoder, however I have noticed a significant quality difference when exporting from Premiere Pro vs Media Encoder, specifically when it comes to lower thirds elements.įirst, some background on what I'm using. Hello! This is my first post here, so please let me know if you'd like any more information.įor my job, I have edit and export daily short (<1 minute) videos for instagram and youtube. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |